What is the difference between VASER and Airsculpt?
When considering body contouring options, two prominent treatments, VASER and AirSculpt, often dominate the conversation. What is the difference between VASER and Airsculpt? Both are known to be game-changers in the aesthetic scene, but how they differ is a topic ripe for examination. Understanding these differences is essential to making informed decisions about fat reduction strategies. This in-depth exploration delves into the details, focusing on the technical aspects, procedures, and potential outcomes of both treatments, but with a particular emphasis on our specialty, High Definition Liposuction.
Fat Removal Capacity Between VASER and AirSculpt
Exploring the differences between VASER liposuction and AirSculpt technologies can help you make an informed decision about your fat removal procedure. One of the primary distinctions is found in their respective approaches to fat removal. VASER liposuction uses ultrasound technology to break down the fat, making it easier to remove. The Airsculpt procedure, on the other hand, uses a process coined AirSculpt, which is promoted as being less invasive, allowing it to be performed while you are awake and providing prospective clients less downtime.
Skin toning differences between VASER and AirSculpt
It’s important to note that with the AirSculpt lift, the brand claims to not only eliminate fat but also have the capacity to tone and tighten your body. The capacity to increase skin tone would provide this modality the added advantage of creating an improved tone and a more tailored look. In comparison, VASER does not make these claims. Instead, it focuses its energy on the fat cells only providing maximum fat removal capacity, with little or no effect on the skin itself.
However, VASER liposuction can be safely combined with Renuvion technology which provides the opportunity to maximally tighten the skin and tone your body. Following the maximum removal of fat cells with VASER, the Renuvion technology is applied during surgery to optimally tighten the skin and soft tissues. In summary, combining VASER and Renuvion has clinically demonstrated the ability to optimize outcomes that are representative of high definition body contouring.
Cannula differences in VASER and Airsculpt
Another difference to consider when you compare Airsculpt to VASER liposuction is the cannula difference. If Airsculpt is your preferred approach, you will be treated with a sleeker wand that provides laser energy as a supplement to assist with the removal of fat and presumed skin tightening. The Airsculpt body contouring technique removes fat after melting it with laser heat, making it hypothetically more powerful than traditional liposuction.
This is in contrast to the VASER technology that utilizes a sleek solid rod to first cavitate the fat cells from solid clusters into single cells. Following cavitation, specialized cannulas allow for continuous, comprehensive, and accurate removal of fat cells that are siphoned out with the use of your non-dominant hand. The difference between AirSculpt liposuction and VASER liposuction lies in the method of fat removal, affecting the precision of fat removal, and the outcomes achieved.
The ultimate choice between the two technologies depends on your individual objectives for your body. By understanding the differences, you can choose the option that best aligns with your aesthetic goals.
Differences for BBL: VASER and Airsculpt Liposculpture
In the realm of body sculpting, Airsculpt Lipo has made a name for itself as a groundbreaking procedure. Unlike traditional liposculpture and other body-contouring methods such as Coolsculpting, Airsculpt Lipo is unique because it touts its minimally invasive approach to effectively remove fat while presumedly tightening the skin.
Remember that Airsculpt employs a technique that utilizes laser energy to gently liquefy the fat before extraction, ensuring minimal discomfort and producing the desired skin-tightening effect. However, since the fat is pierced by the laser beam, it cannot be returned to the body once removed.
This is in contrast to VASER liposuction which preserves the integrity of the fat cells by virtue of its proprietary cavitation process. As a result of preserving the fat cell membrane integrity, the fat cells can be returned back to the body for purposes of fat transfer. Fat transfer has become a mainstay of high-definition body contouring that utilizes fat removal and replacement to optimize contour improvements such as following Brazilian Butt Lift, Natural Breast Augmentation, and even Facial Augmentation. This means that the procedure enhances the natural contours of your body’s multiple folds by not only removing volume when prominent but replacing volume when the volume is lacking.
VASER and Airsculpt Outcomes
A careful glance at our gallery should give you insight into the transformative potential that VASER liposuction procedure provide. With Airsculpt Lipo, all areas of the body can be effectively improved without the need for general anesthesia and minimized downtime. The net effect is a debulking cosmetic procedure that will definitely improve localized areas of concern. However, if you are interested in achieving high-definition body contouring outcomes, then you will have to acknowledge the advantages of VASER liposuction. Although VASER liposuction requires additional procedural steps, longer operative times, and general anesthesia when performing 360 body contouring, it provides unique contouring benefits that are not attainable with Airsculpt.
Benefits of VASER liposuction over Airsculpt
In the sphere of body contouring, two procedures have gained significant attention – VASER and AirSculpt. Recent Featured Articles in esteemed medical journals extensively explore the pros and cons of these fat removal methods, shedding light on their efficacy and safety. AirSculpt, an advanced, Laser-based technology has been compared to VASER liposuction. What’s striking about AirSculpt is its presumed capacity to seamlessly remove fat.
The procedure is touted as being able to remove fat without the need for an incision. Instead, Airsculpt uses a punch biopsy. Whether a punch biopsy is less invasive than a small 4mm incision is definitely a topic of debate. Furthermore, VASER liposuction protects its 4mm incision with a port protector that avoids any mechanical irritation of the skin incision throughout the case. This is in contrast to Airsculpt, which still incurs mechanical trauma to the skin surrounding the punch biopsy hole. The most important factor to consider is the superior outcomes achieved with VASER liposuction when desiring high definition liposuction outcomes.
High definition liposuction Outcomes are achieved only with VASER Liposuction technology
With high-definition liposuction protocols, the precision-guided technology of VASER allows for not only comprehensive but also selective removal of fat resulting in the creation of natural shadows and the unveiling of abdominal muscles. This single advantage of VASER liposuction makes it superior to AirSculpt in patients seeking superior contouring results.
Inarguably, AirSculpt presumes a patient-friendly procedure that advertises comparatively minimized discomfort and downtime. However, VASER liposuction prides itself on achieving superior outcomes that are indicative of exaggerated curves in women and abdominal etching in men. VASER liposuction transformations are not only dramatic but also natural in appearance.
Skin tightening difference of AirSculpt versus VASER
As part of the high definition liposuction paradigm, it is important to consider body contouring in multiple layers. Layers to consider include not only the fat but also the overlying skin and infrastructural network system of collagenous cables and nets. Although AirSculpt promotes its skin-tightening potential, a splendid bonus for those seeking a complete body sculpting solution. However, the tightening of the skin observed clinically with Airsculpts laser technology is far less impressive than the skin tightening observed when radiofrequency energy administered with Renuvion technology is combined with VASER technology.
Whereas VASER liposuction does not provide any tightening of the skin, Renuvion technology is used to supplement the treatment of skin and soft tissue layers following VASER liposuction removal of fat. Renuvion technology provides more effective heating of collagenous fibers found in the supporting cables, called fibro septal network.
High-Definition Liposuction Outcomes
High Definition liposuction procedure draws a stark contrast with the VASER and AirSculpt technologies previously discussed. While both VASER and AirSculpt are excellent body sculpting tools, VASER liposuction stands as the clear winner when a patient’s emphasis relies on achieving aesthetic detail and precision.
It is crucial to remember that any liposuction methodology’s primary goal is to enhance the patient’s body by eliminating unwanted fat. That said, the choice of procedure should align with the individual’s body goals, personal preferences, and physician’s recommendation.
Conclusion: VASER Liposuction versus Airsculpt.
In summary, the combination of VASER liposuction and Renuvion technology provides superior outcomes than those afforded by Airsculpt alone.
VASER liposuction is a treatment that promises transformative results, especially when applied in contexts like a male client’s desire for a six-pack ab or a female client’s desire for Brazilian butt lift augmentation.
The patients’ photos, often displayed during consultations, provide definitive proof of the significant results achieved with VASER, a game-changing liposuction treatment. What sets VASER liposuction apart is its ability to delicately segregate fat from surrounding tissues. This ensures less damage to surrounding tissues and a smoother, more natural-looking result.
